
|
Upload date - 6/11/04 The following is in response to a question from several PPP Licensees: How does our method of packaging gowns compare (or differ) with the Vacuum Seal method? Does our (PPP) preservation process involve or mimic the VACUUM SEAL methods commonly referred to in Industry publications? Within any industry involving differing methods of process, comparison and debate will ultimately lead to studies, tests, and trials to determine the advantages and disadvantages of each method or process. The gown cleaning and preservation/storage industry is no different. Some of the more common methods for gown storage include: * Cleaning & boxing: Acid-neutral
or acid-free box & tissue to package and store gown. Boxes
may have a full bottom with a closed top (no window) or an outer
"shell" with bottom and a windowed top "sleeve"
or cover that is encased by the closed "shell". Tape
is commonly used to seal the seams between the bottom and top
of the box. Pat Moffat, owner of Ram Leather Care, St. Louis, Missouri, recently brought an article published by The Ohio State University Extension to PPP's attention referencing proper storage methods for wedding gowns and heirloom textiles. This Fact Sheet was originally published in 1994 as referenced below, and can be found via the Internet at www.ohioline.osu.edu/hyg-fact/5000/5545.html _________ Ohio State University Extension
Fact Sheet Overall, the Ohio State fact sheet offers solid advice regarding proper cleaning, care, and storage methods for wedding gowns and other heirloom textiles. In the "Packing for Storage" section of this article, under "Commercial Packaging", a reference is made regarding an International Fabricare Institute (IFI) article of the same themeproper long-term packaging and storage of wedding gowns. The IFI article referenced is as follows: International Fabricare Institute Specifically, the Ohio State
fact sheet states: So, back to the question: "Does our preservation process involve or mimic the VACUUM SEAL methods commonly referred to in Industry publications? NO! In fact, as your sales force addresses brides, wholesale accounts, or trade partners, the term "vacuum seal" should never be used to describe PPP's method of packaging & preserving gowns. The "vacuum seal" method referenced in the Ohio State Article implies a method similarly described above (Cleaning and vacuum sealing). The Ohio State Article was published in 1994, and references a similar IFI article, which was published in 1987long before PPP was even founded, and long before PPP's methods were nationally adopted. Although Jim Douglas, founder of PPP, was continuing to use our current method to package and preserve gowns in 1994, PPP wasn't formally organized until 1997. That's why OUR method really doesn't fit the description of ANY methods discussed in the Ohio State fact sheet. Several references within this article, as well as the IFI article, recommend that gown packaging should NOT be sealedwellthese recommendations were based upon the familiar methods known at the time (1987 & 1994) regarding sealed packages and non-sealed packages. Regardless of timing of the
articles, and since references are still commonly made regarding
"vacuum seal" methods, PPP's method of packaging and
PRESERVING gowns is dramatically different than "vacuum
sealing": How about longevity of the nitrogen gas? Will it eventually escape through the pores of the poly shrink film? First and foremost, remember that our method of sealing the gown chamber involves direct contact with the BOX itselfnot direct contact with the gown. If it looks like a duck, acts like a duck, and smells like a duck, regardless of how you dress it, it's still a duckALL poly or plastic material is porous. Will nitrogen eventually escape
through the pores of the poly shrink film? The answer
is "yessome, but not all". Using our method, a properly
sealed and nitrogen-injected gown chamber is accomplished as
follows: Thus, PPP's method continues to be a very SOUND method of packaging and PRESERVING gowns for long-term storage. Always remember that "Anyone can clean and box a gown, but only a select few professionals (YOU) can clean and preserve a gown."
LETTER FROM PAT MOFFAT TO JASMINE GOWNS. I am trying to help a customer who purchased a Jasmine brand gown in Baltimore. This gown is labeled as 100% polyester outer shell, 100% polyester inner shell, Made in China. This gown had several bad spots and we processed according to normal cleaning procedures for polyester materials but lo and behold, this gown is mislabeled and is not a true 100% polyester gown. The material has yellowed as if it were a silk !!! This bride is to be married in 3 weeks. I clean thousands of gowns a year as a Prestige Preservation Licensee Your gown is grossly mislabeled. I wish to forward the gown to you for your examination. This bride is presently being reasonable and accepting reimbursement for the gown in the amount of $357.62. We will be immediately compensating her so that she may move forward on her wedding plans. Has this problem come up before? Has this been addressed? Are your gowns labeled in accordance with the FTC guidelines? Please respond to me asap so I may advise the bridal shops we service that Jasmine stands behind their gowns and they are properly labeled. You can reach me at 1-800-527-5726. Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated. Pat Moffat P.S. I will be advising the Prestige Preservation Licensees of this situation at our national conference in Chicago this weekend. Please let me tell them there is no need to worry about Jasmine brand .
|